[Anarres](The_Dispossessed:_An_Ambiguous_Utopia "wikilink") - '''Ca Favale '''was an [anarcho-communist](Anarcho-Communism "wikilink") [ecovillage](Intentional_Community "wikilink") that existed in rural Italy from [2000 to 2012](Timeline_of_Libertarian_Socialism_in_Southern_Europe "wikilink"). ## Description According to [Peter Gelderloos](Peter_Gelderloos "wikilink"), who stayed there for several nights in 2005, Ca Favale was: > Ca Favale was a little village in the mountains east of Genova. It was > abandoned thirty years ago, and now going on five years a group of > anarchist lived here, restoring the crumbling buildings of stacked > stone. The village sat on about fifteen acres of land. There was a > quartet of chickens, two beehives, dogs, a wriggling pile of newborn > puppies, a hillside of olive trees, grapevines, a couple orange and > lemon trees built into a microclimate on the south side of a stone > wall, terraced gardens, and about eight residents; though the number > climbs as high as twenty in the summer. Most of them are Italians and > German-speaking Swiss in their twenties or fifties. One of the older > people there had been in the struggle for decades. At the end of the > ’70s, early ’80s, her partner was locked up for belonging to an > armed anarchist group. He died in prison, when their son was four. > There were an indeterminate number of buildings in Ca Favale, with > perhaps twenty rooms between them, though half of these were under > renovation, and some even lacked roofs and floors. The architecture > bespoke an organic collectivity, with a common kitchen, one compost > toilet, many bedrooms, and buildings built very much into one another. > The ambiguity between passageways, halls, and courtyards even tested > the separation between inside and outside. > The people of Ca Favale were mostly involved with construction and > renovation, building roofs and the like. My first full day we hauled > thirty years worth of mud from the spring-fed pond that served as > their reservoir, then rebuilt the little dam and reinstalled the pipes > that carried water down the hill. Others were also expanding the > gardens. This work took up most of their typical day. Afterwards they > would gather for a hearty meal and long, involved conversations, > emptying a two-gallon jug of wine in the course of the evening. > Here they countenanced no dichotomy between destroying capitalism and > building a replacement. Though the work of the village kept them busy, > they tried to stay involved in the struggles in the cities, and their > idyllic situation was no doubt a summer haven for city activists. > Several of them also translated anarchist books into Italian. > My second full day there, 20 Marzo, was a day for lying in bed with a > book or a lover listening to the wind howl. Fortunately I had a book, > Notes of a Native Son, another gift from a friend, but > outside of the sleeping bag my hands got too cold to enjoy the > arrangement. After having my fill of lying around I went out to turn > soil for a new garden on a terrace below the houses, along with two > others. The rain began to freeze and bounce off us in white balls, but > this too felt good in a way, so we worked until it was too dark to > see. I asked “What is the difference between work, labor, and play?” > We laughed at the primitivists who said that agriculture was > inherently alienated; that farming was necessarily work in the > negative sense. We were enjoying ourselves there on the mountaintop > terrace — the exertion, the assault of the cold wind, the sense of > accomplishment, the anticipation of watching the growth of delicious > vegetables. Then I got a blister and said: “if I turn one more > shovel-full it will become labor,” so we stopped and went inside for > supper. > At Ca Favale I felt they had really created libertarian communism. > There was plenty of work to do, and some days it was exhausting, but > you invented the curious tendency to do it willingly and happily. You > could sit around all day if you wanted — if you were feeling sick or > low it was encouraged — but before too long you felt moved to get up > and participate in an act of creation. There was no separation between > work and leisure, and the pace of activity, whether resting or > working, was relaxed and self-guided. Certain days brought a burst of > energy to finish some project, and those involved worked fast and > hard, but the next day would happen to be a rainy day and we would do > nothing but talk and cook or nap under warm blankets. There was no > system of inducements, no rewards and punishments, and if you had a > problem working with someone else you talked about it as a group, > argued a little, laughed and resolved it. Or, I heard, personal dramas > would grow and deepen, and maybe they would go away in time, or maybe > somebody would leave. This wasn’t paradise. Some of the folks in the > collective got sick of one another, and they often had to work hard to > communicate well or find common ground. But it was great to see in > practice how people need no wage or fear of punishment as long as they > are living for themselves, not working for someone else. > Martedi, 21 Marzo was a glorious sunny day in the mountains. Three of > us turned more soil, preparing gardens for planting, talking in > capering Italiano or the knock-kneed singsong of Schwitz-Dutch. Later > we split wood. Around noon I sat on sun-warmed slate and wrote a > letter to L, the uppies napping around my feet or nibbling my toes. > Only then did I realize it was the first day of spring. This would be > a good year, I decided. I sensed there was some tribulation waiting in > the wings; not an easy year, but a good one nonetheless.\[1\] ## Disbanding In 2012, members of the ecovillage collectively agreed to disband the community. In their own words: > After many years, we came to the conclusion that ecovillages, as much > as we know them, aim mainly to settle into “civil society” and are > actively seeking no confrontation with the world surrounding them. > Different from the perspective of fighting domination and exploitation > and achieving mutual support, these places act as “access > concentrators”. Traffic goes in, but seldom comes out – if you > understand the difference. As a matter of fact they represent the > evolution of old society, in a greener civil society. But war, > science, economics, (or, in just a word – power) are not questioned. > When you visit an ecovillage you will generally pay per stay. In some > of them you won’t be able to even cook for yourself. In some others, > you won’t be able to simply put your tent. Paid services will be > present for everything you can imagine. In some places you will have > to pay just to hear some guru speak. They represent the opposite of > what free people are looking for.\[2\] ## References 1. [Peter Gelderloos](Peter_Gelderloos "wikilink") (2010) [To Get to the Other Side: a journey through Europe and its anarchist movements](To_Get_to_the_Other_Side "wikilink") 2.